<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ten Little Niggers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Original Pechanga</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/comment-page-1/#comment-92889</link>
		<dc:creator>Original Pechanga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/#comment-92889</guid>
		<description>Out here in CA, the NAACP is supporting civil rights violators, the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians.   Pechanga has eliminated 25% of their tribe, denied those terminated due process, attorneys, right to confront their accusers and the CA NAACP is supporting them in expanding their gaming operations.   Guess the &#039;good old days&#039; when civil rights meant something are gone for good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out here in CA, the NAACP is supporting civil rights violators, the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians.   Pechanga has eliminated 25% of their tribe, denied those terminated due process, attorneys, right to confront their accusers and the CA NAACP is supporting them in expanding their gaming operations.   Guess the &#8216;good old days&#8217; when civil rights meant something are gone for good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronbo Jin</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/comment-page-1/#comment-92733</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronbo Jin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 19:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/#comment-92733</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve given up watching shows in syndication (especially on Hallmark) because they have been butchered to make way for more commercials. Sometimes rendering the show to be totally incomprehensible.

The last straw was when Hallmark chopped off the ending of a Columbo. Do yourself a favor. Treat yourself to the Murder She Wrote boxed sets. 

Also the Perry Mason boxed sets are excellent.

Even shows on the network are crapped up with those promos for upcoming shows (they call them sniping. There are some network execs that need to be sniped!)

And on the flip side, Charlie Brown&#039;s Christmas, a 25 minute show is put in an hour time slot so we can be bombarded by 35 minutes of commercials. This undermines the message of the show which is that Christmas in not about stuff.

No wonder viewership is down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve given up watching shows in syndication (especially on Hallmark) because they have been butchered to make way for more commercials. Sometimes rendering the show to be totally incomprehensible.</p>
<p>The last straw was when Hallmark chopped off the ending of a Columbo. Do yourself a favor. Treat yourself to the Murder She Wrote boxed sets. </p>
<p>Also the Perry Mason boxed sets are excellent.</p>
<p>Even shows on the network are crapped up with those promos for upcoming shows (they call them sniping. There are some network execs that need to be sniped!)</p>
<p>And on the flip side, Charlie Brown&#8217;s Christmas, a 25 minute show is put in an hour time slot so we can be bombarded by 35 minutes of commercials. This undermines the message of the show which is that Christmas in not about stuff.</p>
<p>No wonder viewership is down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeacherLady</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/comment-page-1/#comment-92731</link>
		<dc:creator>TeacherLady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 18:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/#comment-92731</guid>
		<description>Boy you&#039;re lucky. I posted my two cents about this news story and got a bunch of angry parents and teachers responding to me. Thanks for sharing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy you&#8217;re lucky. I posted my two cents about this news story and got a bunch of angry parents and teachers responding to me. Thanks for sharing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/comment-page-1/#comment-92723</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/#comment-92723</guid>
		<description>Maybe they should clean their own house before raising such a ruckus.  The last I heard, the term &quot;colored&quot; was considered racist, and it&#039;s right there in their organization&#039;s name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe they should clean their own house before raising such a ruckus.  The last I heard, the term &#8220;colored&#8221; was considered racist, and it&#8217;s right there in their organization&#8217;s name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BIRDZILLA</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/comment-page-1/#comment-92698</link>
		<dc:creator>BIRDZILLA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/#comment-92698</guid>
		<description>It should interest all black americans that the first gun control laws were passed to prevent the newly freed slaves from obtaining firearms for self defense and their a conservative rap song that tell of it and why dose the NACP support gun control when it was used to disarm the newly freed slaves?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should interest all black americans that the first gun control laws were passed to prevent the newly freed slaves from obtaining firearms for self defense and their a conservative rap song that tell of it and why dose the NACP support gun control when it was used to disarm the newly freed slaves?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/comment-page-1/#comment-92682</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/#comment-92682</guid>
		<description>batyah, thanks.  That&#039;s the thing about inane nonsense.  Personally, I can&#039;t abide letting any such post stand uncorrected lest:
1) the posters think themselves correct and continue perpetuating PC garbage, and,
2) others, not knowing better, think the nonresponse to mean it&#039;s valid.

Even better is that such posters don&#039;t get the last word even if we agree to disagree. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>batyah, thanks.  That&#8217;s the thing about inane nonsense.  Personally, I can&#8217;t abide letting any such post stand uncorrected lest:<br />
1) the posters think themselves correct and continue perpetuating PC garbage, and,<br />
2) others, not knowing better, think the nonresponse to mean it&#8217;s valid.</p>
<p>Even better is that such posters don&#8217;t get the last word even if we agree to disagree. <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Phelan</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/comment-page-1/#comment-92675</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Phelan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 15:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/#comment-92675</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;However, I do take small issue with those making the effort to show that the use of the word nigger is benign in Britain,&lt;/i&gt;
I agree, it&#039;s both silly and irrelevant, because:
&lt;i&gt; or that it’s impossible to understand why people take offense.&lt;/i&gt;
I &lt;b&gt;do&lt;/b&gt; find it impossible to understand why people are taking offense at something that was &lt;b&gt; recognized, corrected, and apologized for many years ago!&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>However, I do take small issue with those making the effort to show that the use of the word nigger is benign in Britain,</i><br />
I agree, it&#8217;s both silly and irrelevant, because:<br />
<i> or that it’s impossible to understand why people take offense.</i><br />
I <b>do</b> find it impossible to understand why people are taking offense at something that was <b> recognized, corrected, and apologized for many years ago!</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: batyah</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/comment-page-1/#comment-92667</link>
		<dc:creator>batyah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/#comment-92667</guid>
		<description>Andy, what a great response. My hat&#039;s off to you. I wasn&#039;t even going to bother responding to that nonsense (in fact, at first, I thought she was writing a humorous satire), but you did a great job. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy, what a great response. My hat&#8217;s off to you. I wasn&#8217;t even going to bother responding to that nonsense (in fact, at first, I thought she was writing a humorous satire), but you did a great job. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/comment-page-1/#comment-92663</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 02:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/#comment-92663</guid>
		<description>PS -- in the stage play and movie versions of the novel, Mrs. Christie allows two of the accused murders to escape their deaths because they turned out to be innocent of the crimes they were accused of by the mysterious owner of &quot;Indian Island.&quot; She wrote the stage version specifically for the American market and being half-American herself, she knew that optimistic Americans would prefer that ending to the one in the novel, where all characters are guilty and all die.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS &#8212; in the stage play and movie versions of the novel, Mrs. Christie allows two of the accused murders to escape their deaths because they turned out to be innocent of the crimes they were accused of by the mysterious owner of &#8220;Indian Island.&#8221; She wrote the stage version specifically for the American market and being half-American herself, she knew that optimistic Americans would prefer that ending to the one in the novel, where all characters are guilty and all die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/comment-page-1/#comment-92662</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 02:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/#comment-92662</guid>
		<description>Heh. I have a relative-in-law who is black. One time he was over at my house watching TV in the family room (he was about 11 at the time) and I heard him shout: &quot;Oh great, it&#039;s my favorite TV show coming on!&quot; Curious, I hurried into the family room to see what it was that had excited his enthusiasm so much. That&#039;s So Raven, perhaps?

Murder She Wrote!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh. I have a relative-in-law who is black. One time he was over at my house watching TV in the family room (he was about 11 at the time) and I heard him shout: &#8220;Oh great, it&#8217;s my favorite TV show coming on!&#8221; Curious, I hurried into the family room to see what it was that had excited his enthusiasm so much. That&#8217;s So Raven, perhaps?</p>
<p>Murder She Wrote!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danno</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/comment-page-1/#comment-92661</link>
		<dc:creator>Danno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 01:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/#comment-92661</guid>
		<description>There are some great comments on this site.  

The NAACP complaining because of what the play&#039;s title was in 1939?  I laughed when I saw that LSB filed under &quot;Lunacy&quot;.  That&#039;s where it belongs.

As far as the NAACP having no important work left to do, well . . . as presently constituted, I agree.   But the organization still has potential to do good with the right leadership.  

Each time a director quits, I fantasize about applying for the job.  If appointed, I would change its focus to promoting actual advancement instead of moaning about minor or nonexistent insults.  

Since racism is no longer the primary obstacle to advancement for Colored People, and illegitimacy is, then why shouldn&#039;t the NAACP de-emphasize fighting racism and redirect their primary effort to fight illegitimacy?

Just a fantasy, I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some great comments on this site.  </p>
<p>The NAACP complaining because of what the play&#8217;s title was in 1939?  I laughed when I saw that LSB filed under &#8220;Lunacy&#8221;.  That&#8217;s where it belongs.</p>
<p>As far as the NAACP having no important work left to do, well . . . as presently constituted, I agree.   But the organization still has potential to do good with the right leadership.  </p>
<p>Each time a director quits, I fantasize about applying for the job.  If appointed, I would change its focus to promoting actual advancement instead of moaning about minor or nonexistent insults.  </p>
<p>Since racism is no longer the primary obstacle to advancement for Colored People, and illegitimacy is, then why shouldn&#8217;t the NAACP de-emphasize fighting racism and redirect their primary effort to fight illegitimacy?</p>
<p>Just a fantasy, I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/comment-page-1/#comment-92660</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 01:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/#comment-92660</guid>
		<description>Nicole, wow!  Taking us from the various titles of the subject play into censorship of indigenous people was a teachable moment of pretzel logic. However, I must say your aggrieved &amp; heartfelt post is sincerely wrong on so many levels.  

For starters, check out La Shawn&#039;s archives on Native Americans.  
1) Everyone born here is a Native American, 
2) The Indians who met the Colonials were at one time migrants from Asia,
3) Naming a school and/or mascot after Indian tribes and/or objects (i.e. Sioux, Lakota, Cheyenne, Choctaw, Tomahawk, Brave etc) is INDEED a form of paying respect.  So spare us the contrived insult.

As for the content of the play, do you even know the story?  If so, please point out where racism is promoted?  Otherwise, please don&#039;t spout talking points on the basis of fevered imaginings.

We&#039;re often told by educators to never judge a book by its cover.  I would also emphatically add that one shouldn&#039;t judge a book by the catalog of words used, rather, judgment should be reserved for the arrangement of said catalog.  By your standards, I&#039;m guessing that you think &lt;i&gt;Gone with the Wind&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Adventures of Tom Sawyer&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Uncle Tom&#039;s Cabin&lt;/i&gt;, among other classics, are also vile &amp; racist books.  

Not knowing the critical difference is indeed a sign of deep and abiding ignorance.  It also further proof of a failing education system that mass-produces un-critical, but PC, citizens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicole, wow!  Taking us from the various titles of the subject play into censorship of indigenous people was a teachable moment of pretzel logic. However, I must say your aggrieved &amp; heartfelt post is sincerely wrong on so many levels.  </p>
<p>For starters, check out La Shawn&#8217;s archives on Native Americans.<br />
1) Everyone born here is a Native American,<br />
2) The Indians who met the Colonials were at one time migrants from Asia,<br />
3) Naming a school and/or mascot after Indian tribes and/or objects (i.e. Sioux, Lakota, Cheyenne, Choctaw, Tomahawk, Brave etc) is INDEED a form of paying respect.  So spare us the contrived insult.</p>
<p>As for the content of the play, do you even know the story?  If so, please point out where racism is promoted?  Otherwise, please don&#8217;t spout talking points on the basis of fevered imaginings.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re often told by educators to never judge a book by its cover.  I would also emphatically add that one shouldn&#8217;t judge a book by the catalog of words used, rather, judgment should be reserved for the arrangement of said catalog.  By your standards, I&#8217;m guessing that you think <i>Gone with the Wind</i>, <i>Adventures of Tom Sawyer</i> and <i>Uncle Tom&#8217;s Cabin</i>, among other classics, are also vile &amp; racist books.  </p>
<p>Not knowing the critical difference is indeed a sign of deep and abiding ignorance.  It also further proof of a failing education system that mass-produces un-critical, but PC, citizens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trish</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/comment-page-1/#comment-92656</link>
		<dc:creator>Trish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/#comment-92656</guid>
		<description>batyah--
oh, my goodness, yes.  Sticks and stones. . .

Finn, let&#039;s be honest, here.  You say a slave can call a fellow slave &quot;slave&quot;, but the son of the slave owner can&#039;t.  What about the son of the abolitionist?  Why should he be blamed for something he not only didn&#039;t do, but fought against?  That&#039;s really what your argument is saying.  If &quot;nigger&quot; is an offensive word(and it is),  it&#039;s offensive when any person says it--otherwise the entire concept of racial equality means nothing.
When black people realize they&#039;re degrading themselves by using the word, we&#039;ll be on to something.

And Finn--&quot;Wherever you are, or go, if you are dark-skinned, there is a negative name for you&quot;?  No.  Wherever you are, or go, if you are dark-skinned, light-skinned, or somewhere in between, there is a negative name for you.  If you are white, wherever you go there is a negative name for you, just as there is if you are black.  
The difference is that most of the rest of us don&#039;t use those words to refer to ourselves.  Black people need to stop degrading themselves this way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>batyah&#8211;<br />
oh, my goodness, yes.  Sticks and stones. . .</p>
<p>Finn, let&#8217;s be honest, here.  You say a slave can call a fellow slave &#8220;slave&#8221;, but the son of the slave owner can&#8217;t.  What about the son of the abolitionist?  Why should he be blamed for something he not only didn&#8217;t do, but fought against?  That&#8217;s really what your argument is saying.  If &#8220;nigger&#8221; is an offensive word(and it is),  it&#8217;s offensive when any person says it&#8211;otherwise the entire concept of racial equality means nothing.<br />
When black people realize they&#8217;re degrading themselves by using the word, we&#8217;ll be on to something.</p>
<p>And Finn&#8211;&#8221;Wherever you are, or go, if you are dark-skinned, there is a negative name for you&#8221;?  No.  Wherever you are, or go, if you are dark-skinned, light-skinned, or somewhere in between, there is a negative name for you.  If you are white, wherever you go there is a negative name for you, just as there is if you are black.<br />
The difference is that most of the rest of us don&#8217;t use those words to refer to ourselves.  Black people need to stop degrading themselves this way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/comment-page-1/#comment-92654</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 23:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/#comment-92654</guid>
		<description>As an educator I am appalled at the decision to proceed with the play under any name.  The title, the previous title, the new title, and the lyrics to the song or &#039;nursery rhyme&#039; from which they were derived are racist, and it is very clear that faculty, administrators, parents and students at Lakota East are aware of that. Continuing in arrogance despite the pleas of aggrieved groups is reprehensible.  Supporters of the play may think that now &#039;there are none&#039; to stand up and respond, but this too is a sign of deep and abiding ignorance- the same ignorance that allows them to unabashedly use the name &#039;Lakota&#039; and stick &#039;tomahawks&#039; in the helmets of their team.  These symbols are not funny and they do no honor to Native Americans. They are offensive, and the continued use of those symbols dishonors the school district.  Listen to the national outcry, and consider how respectable institutes of higher learning will respond to Lakota east graduates with this abominable behavior the symbol of their school. How can this play represent a &#039;teachable moment&#039; when the entire school district consistently endorses racism? Who there is qualified to teach about &#039;diversity&#039;? The play is the tip of the iceberg.  The call to stop the play is NOT about censorship. It is about more free speech - it is about hearing at long last the voices of people Lakota East PRETENDS to emulate but continues to ignore. Shame on all of you who support the censorship of indigenous people!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an educator I am appalled at the decision to proceed with the play under any name.  The title, the previous title, the new title, and the lyrics to the song or &#8216;nursery rhyme&#8217; from which they were derived are racist, and it is very clear that faculty, administrators, parents and students at Lakota East are aware of that. Continuing in arrogance despite the pleas of aggrieved groups is reprehensible.  Supporters of the play may think that now &#8216;there are none&#8217; to stand up and respond, but this too is a sign of deep and abiding ignorance- the same ignorance that allows them to unabashedly use the name &#8216;Lakota&#8217; and stick &#8216;tomahawks&#8217; in the helmets of their team.  These symbols are not funny and they do no honor to Native Americans. They are offensive, and the continued use of those symbols dishonors the school district.  Listen to the national outcry, and consider how respectable institutes of higher learning will respond to Lakota east graduates with this abominable behavior the symbol of their school. How can this play represent a &#8216;teachable moment&#8217; when the entire school district consistently endorses racism? Who there is qualified to teach about &#8216;diversity&#8217;? The play is the tip of the iceberg.  The call to stop the play is NOT about censorship. It is about more free speech &#8211; it is about hearing at long last the voices of people Lakota East PRETENDS to emulate but continues to ignore. Shame on all of you who support the censorship of indigenous people!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: batyah</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/comment-page-1/#comment-92648</link>
		<dc:creator>batyah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 06:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2007/11/28/ten-little-niggers/#comment-92648</guid>
		<description>Trish, you brought back memories of my younger days when I was visiting England and being asked out on a date by a local man.  He said &quot;I&#039;ll come by around 8pm and knock you up.&quot;  I was shocked!!  I guess the expression on my face must have clued him in because he hastily said, &quot;I mean, I&#039;ll knock on your door.&quot;  

Heh heh heh!!!  

I understand why &quot;nigger&quot; is an offensive term, but then, it needs to be perceived as offensive no matter who uses it.  I strenuously object to referring to it as &quot;the N word.&quot;  How ludicrous, as if &quot;nigger&quot; has so much power that to spell it out might destroy someone. Give me a break. 

People find themselves on the wrong battlefield for one simple reason: cowardice.  Some blacks are too afraid to fight real racism, and they don&#039;t want to touch black racism at all. So they busy themselves with nonsense. Some gays are too afraid to fight real oppression (that&#039;s why they can&#039;t speak out against Islam, which calls for the wholesale slaughter of homosexuals) so they have to pretend that gay marriage is the most important human rights endeavor of the past five centuries.  Some feminists (okay, MOST feminists) are too cowardly to speak out against the outrageous human rights abuses against women in Muslim countries, or even those Muslim immigrants right here at home who are being murdered for &quot;honor,&quot; and so they continue to natter on about abortion rights and the lack of government subsidized daycare, or the imaginary glass ceiling in the business world.  

So many cowards and liars. But more people are waking up to what they are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trish, you brought back memories of my younger days when I was visiting England and being asked out on a date by a local man.  He said &#8220;I&#8217;ll come by around 8pm and knock you up.&#8221;  I was shocked!!  I guess the expression on my face must have clued him in because he hastily said, &#8220;I mean, I&#8217;ll knock on your door.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Heh heh heh!!!  </p>
<p>I understand why &#8220;nigger&#8221; is an offensive term, but then, it needs to be perceived as offensive no matter who uses it.  I strenuously object to referring to it as &#8220;the N word.&#8221;  How ludicrous, as if &#8220;nigger&#8221; has so much power that to spell it out might destroy someone. Give me a break. </p>
<p>People find themselves on the wrong battlefield for one simple reason: cowardice.  Some blacks are too afraid to fight real racism, and they don&#8217;t want to touch black racism at all. So they busy themselves with nonsense. Some gays are too afraid to fight real oppression (that&#8217;s why they can&#8217;t speak out against Islam, which calls for the wholesale slaughter of homosexuals) so they have to pretend that gay marriage is the most important human rights endeavor of the past five centuries.  Some feminists (okay, MOST feminists) are too cowardly to speak out against the outrageous human rights abuses against women in Muslim countries, or even those Muslim immigrants right here at home who are being murdered for &#8220;honor,&#8221; and so they continue to natter on about abortion rights and the lack of government subsidized daycare, or the imaginary glass ceiling in the business world.  </p>
<p>So many cowards and liars. But more people are waking up to what they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
