If you believe marriage should be defined as between one man and one woman, you are divisive and discriminatory, said future President Barack Hussein Obama (Source).
But by his own logic, BHO’s also divisive and discriminatory, because he reportedly said he believes marriage should be defined as between a man and a woman. I don’t get it. Which is it, BHO?
There’s more. Once upon a time, BHO said the issue of homosexual “marriage” should be left to the states. The people should vote yay or nay. He’s apparently changed his mind. Now he believes homosexual “marriage” should be forced on the people by the courts.
You may recall that after the California Supreme Court overturned a law banning homosexual “marriage” last month, the people of California leapt into action, adding over one million signatures to a petition to put the question on the November ballot. Californians will get to decide whether homosexuals can “marry” in their state. But BHO cried foul.
“As the Democratic nominee for President, I am proud to join with and support the LGBT community in an effort to set our nation on a course that recognizes LGBT Americans with full equality under the law…And that is why I oppose the divisive and discriminatory efforts to amend the California Constitution, and similar efforts to amend the U.S. Constitution or those of other states,” BHO wrote in a letter to Alice B. Toklas LGBT Democratic Club.
(As I’ve written many times on this blog, homosexuals have the same rights as the rest of us. What they want are superior rights. Subverting the will of the people is what liberals must do to push their agenda. It couldn’t work any other way.)
So many people are mesmerized by this “articulate” liberal who doesn’t like being called a liberal, despite doing and standing for liberal things. People who profess Christ are actually prepared to vote for this “Christian” who voted against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act, a measure designed to protect babies born alive during abortions. He voted against it. In other words, BHO believes babies who managed to survive an abortion attempt should be left to die. Is that registering in your mesmerized brain? I doubt the religious sincerity of anyone calling himself a Christian who intends to vote for BHO knowing that he voted against this life-saving measure, and I’ll say it on the radio, on TV, and to your face.
Ever since I first heard the name “Barack Obama” back in 2004, I’ve been trying to figure out why people seem to be fascinated with him. Is he good looking? A matter of taste, but not according to mine. Perhaps his height is the key to his appeal. No? He wears nice suits. Maybe that’s it. Or perhaps people think he’s cool because he went to Harvard. No, I don’t think so. With race preference policies in place all over the place, getting into Harvard doesn’t have the same cachet.
So tell me, Christian readers, if you’re voting for BHO, why, for the love of God? Why are you voting for a “Christian” who believes unwanted-by-their-mothers infants should be left to die? I am pleading with you to give a biblically sound, coherent explanation. Inquiring hearts want to know.
Update: Commenter edub writes:
“You know Lashawn, a few years ago, I was so against EVERYTHING you wrote, however as I find my way back into the word of God, I begin to understand you more and more and so appreciate your logic and your words…You have no idea how happy I am that you are covering BO as you are one of the few people who refuses to bow down and worship him. I’ve been disturbed by BO for quite sometime and I don’t get the appeal either and I have yet to find an outlet to where I can express my concern.”
You can express yourself at LBC, edub. Thanks for reading. 
