<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DC Hit With Another Second Amendment Lawsuit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/07/28/dc-hit-with-another-second-amendment-lawsuit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/07/28/dc-hit-with-another-second-amendment-lawsuit/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CorbinKale</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/07/28/dc-hit-with-another-second-amendment-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-95223</link>
		<dc:creator>CorbinKale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/07/28/dc-hit-with-another-second-amendment-lawsuit/#comment-95223</guid>
		<description>Comment by The Sanity Inspector:
&quot;Think of all the extra paperwork the police would have to fill out, if DC citizens were allowed to defend themselves.&quot;

Yes, those pesky survivors will have to be interviewed for their statements, rather than bagged and tagged, like before. Plus, who knows how many more victims will report crime and testify, now that they can protect themselves from retaliation? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment by The Sanity Inspector:<br />
&#8220;Think of all the extra paperwork the police would have to fill out, if DC citizens were allowed to defend themselves.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, those pesky survivors will have to be interviewed for their statements, rather than bagged and tagged, like before. Plus, who knows how many more victims will report crime and testify, now that they can protect themselves from retaliation? <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sanity Inspector</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/07/28/dc-hit-with-another-second-amendment-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-95118</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sanity Inspector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 21:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/07/28/dc-hit-with-another-second-amendment-lawsuit/#comment-95118</guid>
		<description>Think of all the extra paperwork the police would have to fill out, if DC citizens were allowed to defend themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think of all the extra paperwork the police would have to fill out, if DC citizens were allowed to defend themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom TB</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/07/28/dc-hit-with-another-second-amendment-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-95051</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom TB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/07/28/dc-hit-with-another-second-amendment-lawsuit/#comment-95051</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t the Justices of the Supreme Court order the Mayor and members of the city council to comply with the Heller decision, or be held in contempt?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t the Justices of the Supreme Court order the Mayor and members of the city council to comply with the Heller decision, or be held in contempt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Ol&#8217; Broad&#8217;s Ramblings</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/07/28/dc-hit-with-another-second-amendment-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-95045</link>
		<dc:creator>An Ol&#8217; Broad&#8217;s Ramblings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/07/28/dc-hit-with-another-second-amendment-lawsuit/#comment-95045</guid>
		<description>I wasn’t aware that the 2nd Amendment was so difficult to understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn’t aware that the 2nd Amendment was so difficult to understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CorbinKale</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/07/28/dc-hit-with-another-second-amendment-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-95044</link>
		<dc:creator>CorbinKale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/07/28/dc-hit-with-another-second-amendment-lawsuit/#comment-95044</guid>
		<description>I saw this coming. :) Now maybe the SCOTUS will get to decide what &#039;shall not be infringed&#039; means. How can anyone reconcile &#039;shall not be infringed&#039; with the &#039;reasonable infringments&#039; that are gun control laws.

Couple that with the push for Unlicensed Open Carry in the remaining 6 states that ban it, and it is easy to see a trend towards restoration of our Constitution. These are exciting times!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this coming. <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Now maybe the SCOTUS will get to decide what &#8217;shall not be infringed&#8217; means. How can anyone reconcile &#8217;shall not be infringed&#8217; with the &#8216;reasonable infringments&#8217; that are gun control laws.</p>
<p>Couple that with the push for Unlicensed Open Carry in the remaining 6 states that ban it, and it is easy to see a trend towards restoration of our Constitution. These are exciting times!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
