<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Palin&#8217;s Foreign Policy Flame-Out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:49:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/comment-page-2/#comment-96782</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 07:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/#comment-96782</guid>
		<description>Ditto to Michelle @ #37, Mike @ #58, Mwalimu @ #63 &amp; Glamchilfd @ # 66.

Sarah may be &quot;weak&quot; compared to the towers of experience that is the DC insider, including McVain.  It is precisely that she doesn&#039;t have much of a track record that I hope she proves to be a pleasant &amp; conservative surprise.

Remember Reagan and his lack of experience -- Bedtime for Bonzo et al?

How about Abe Lincoln the country-bumpkin lawyer?

Maybe what is needed is not experience, but the right aptitude &amp; attitude.

Granted the wife as the caregiver role is something to consider....  

I&#039;ve considered the following:
1) 1 Tim 2 really applies to the body of the church, more so than the public/social life
2) If the husband &amp; wife are willing to &quot;swap&quot; responsibilities, I don&#039;t have a problem with it as long as the children aren&#039;t neglected a nurturing environment.
3) Maybe this is our &quot;Deborah&quot; moment, where men with a pair couldn&#039;t be found to lead, so a woman had to step forward (Judges 4) and thus drive the stake into the temple of Barack.
4) No doubt that McVain, as a &quot;conservative&quot; would be as bad or worse than Dubya, President Palin is bound to be better.  Better than even Condi who we once had great hopes for until her pro-choice, pro-AA bent was revealed and her dogged determination to emasculate Israel. (I say President Palin, because we all know it is the VP that pulls the puppet strings a la Cheney ;) )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto to Michelle @ #37, Mike @ #58, Mwalimu @ #63 &amp; Glamchilfd @ # 66.</p>
<p>Sarah may be &#8220;weak&#8221; compared to the towers of experience that is the DC insider, including McVain.  It is precisely that she doesn&#8217;t have much of a track record that I hope she proves to be a pleasant &amp; conservative surprise.</p>
<p>Remember Reagan and his lack of experience &#8212; Bedtime for Bonzo et al?</p>
<p>How about Abe Lincoln the country-bumpkin lawyer?</p>
<p>Maybe what is needed is not experience, but the right aptitude &amp; attitude.</p>
<p>Granted the wife as the caregiver role is something to consider&#8230;.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve considered the following:<br />
1) 1 Tim 2 really applies to the body of the church, more so than the public/social life<br />
2) If the husband &amp; wife are willing to &#8220;swap&#8221; responsibilities, I don&#8217;t have a problem with it as long as the children aren&#8217;t neglected a nurturing environment.<br />
3) Maybe this is our &#8220;Deborah&#8221; moment, where men with a pair couldn&#8217;t be found to lead, so a woman had to step forward (Judges 4) and thus drive the stake into the temple of Barack.<br />
4) No doubt that McVain, as a &#8220;conservative&#8221; would be as bad or worse than Dubya, President Palin is bound to be better.  Better than even Condi who we once had great hopes for until her pro-choice, pro-AA bent was revealed and her dogged determination to emasculate Israel. (I say President Palin, because we all know it is the VP that pulls the puppet strings a la Cheney <img src='http://lashawnbarber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conservblack</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/comment-page-2/#comment-96780</link>
		<dc:creator>conservblack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 05:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/#comment-96780</guid>
		<description>Hey RSG,

Barack is a natural born US citizen. His mother was a US citizen. I think if you don&#039;t agree with Obama, disagree with his specific policies or proposals. Don&#039;t continue to repeat racist Internet trash. BTW, I think for this time and complex world that we live in, Gov.Palin is not qualified to be VEEP either. McCain just repeated the mistake that the Dems have done. You don&#039;t nominate somebody based solely on biography, there has to be some substance as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey RSG,</p>
<p>Barack is a natural born US citizen. His mother was a US citizen. I think if you don&#8217;t agree with Obama, disagree with his specific policies or proposals. Don&#8217;t continue to repeat racist Internet trash. BTW, I think for this time and complex world that we live in, Gov.Palin is not qualified to be VEEP either. McCain just repeated the mistake that the Dems have done. You don&#8217;t nominate somebody based solely on biography, there has to be some substance as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glamchild</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/comment-page-2/#comment-96776</link>
		<dc:creator>Glamchild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 03:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/#comment-96776</guid>
		<description>Kathleen Parker was a big fan of Al Gore during the 2000 elections, and she and Tipper have been friends for years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathleen Parker was a big fan of Al Gore during the 2000 elections, and she and Tipper have been friends for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glamchild</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/comment-page-2/#comment-96775</link>
		<dc:creator>Glamchild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 03:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/#comment-96775</guid>
		<description>If Sarah Palin is so horrible, how is it that  she managed attract 60,000 people to her campaign rally in Florida  ?

If Kathleen Parker makes up her mind based on Katie Couric&#039;s hostile questions, and Charlie Gibsons inquisition.....that&#039;s says more about Kathleen Parker than it does about Palin.

Parker wants more of the same robotic, wonky answers to adversarial questions ?

I thought Palin was fresh and original.  Palin kept her cool, and it was a catty tit-for-tat retort to Couric who admitted to &quot;belaboring&quot; the point.

Watch that interview moment again.....Couric winks and admits to &quot;belaboring&quot;...
Couric actually said that word, and all Palin was looking to do was to end Couric&#039;s exhausting &quot;belaboring&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Sarah Palin is so horrible, how is it that  she managed attract 60,000 people to her campaign rally in Florida  ?</p>
<p>If Kathleen Parker makes up her mind based on Katie Couric&#8217;s hostile questions, and Charlie Gibsons inquisition&#8230;..that&#8217;s says more about Kathleen Parker than it does about Palin.</p>
<p>Parker wants more of the same robotic, wonky answers to adversarial questions ?</p>
<p>I thought Palin was fresh and original.  Palin kept her cool, and it was a catty tit-for-tat retort to Couric who admitted to &#8220;belaboring&#8221; the point.</p>
<p>Watch that interview moment again&#8230;..Couric winks and admits to &#8220;belaboring&#8221;&#8230;<br />
Couric actually said that word, and all Palin was looking to do was to end Couric&#8217;s exhausting &#8220;belaboring&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AProudVeteran</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/comment-page-2/#comment-96770</link>
		<dc:creator>AProudVeteran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 00:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/#comment-96770</guid>
		<description>Have any of y&#039;all read the UNEDITED Charlie Gibson/Sarah Palin interview?  I don&#039;t know if there&#039;s a similar one for the Couric interview, or if that one was live, but I do know that I lost all respect for Couric when she stated that she hoped (on broadcast TV)that Saddam Hussein would elude those who were hunting him.

The Unedited Gibson Interview: http://marklevinshow.com/gibson-interview/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have any of y&#8217;all read the UNEDITED Charlie Gibson/Sarah Palin interview?  I don&#8217;t know if there&#8217;s a similar one for the Couric interview, or if that one was live, but I do know that I lost all respect for Couric when she stated that she hoped (on broadcast TV)that Saddam Hussein would elude those who were hunting him.</p>
<p>The Unedited Gibson Interview: <a href="http://marklevinshow.com/gibson-interview/" rel="nofollow">http://marklevinshow.com/gibson-interview/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mwalimu Daudi</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/comment-page-2/#comment-96769</link>
		<dc:creator>Mwalimu Daudi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 00:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/#comment-96769</guid>
		<description>Kathleen Parker? A conservative? During the 2004 elections she dithered between Bush and Kerry.

&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/1248366.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here is an interesting recent column of hers.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; A key quote:

&lt;i&gt;I worry that [Palin] won&#039;t intellectualize enough. I worry about her certitude and her slight offness. Whatever her charms, anyone in public office who thinks out loud about banning books might be missing some aces in her deck.

I worry about a worldview that might have been shaped in part by a minister who believes that Alaska someday will be home to Christian renegades arriving for the Rapture.&lt;/i&gt;

Ah, yes – playing the Narrow-Minded Gap-Toothed Knuckle-Dragging Stupid Christianist Theocrat-on-the-Rampage card.  That&#039;s the sort of bigoted nonsense we get in truckloads from the Far Left 24/7. Parker offers no proof of her allegations. Parker offers no proof of any kind.

And this:

&lt;i&gt;I love Obama for his style, grace, intellect and his way with words. I want the healing power that an Obama presidency could deliver to this country.&lt;/i&gt;

Oh, brother!  Yes - Parker does go on to rip the Messiah in the same column, but the upshot of her piece is that the Chosen One is too &lt;i&gt;intellectual&lt;/i&gt; to be President (too good for the country, perhaps?). She calls for Palin to be replaced for her supposed lack of aptitude and for her religious views (do we now have a religious test for office?). But not He Whose Middle Name Must Not Be Mentioned, whose name will be on all 57 states.

Remind me again how Parker is a conservative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathleen Parker? A conservative? During the 2004 elections she dithered between Bush and Kerry.</p>
<p><b><a href="http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/1248366.html" rel="nofollow">Here is an interesting recent column of hers.</a></b> A key quote:</p>
<p><i>I worry that [Palin] won&#8217;t intellectualize enough. I worry about her certitude and her slight offness. Whatever her charms, anyone in public office who thinks out loud about banning books might be missing some aces in her deck.</p>
<p>I worry about a worldview that might have been shaped in part by a minister who believes that Alaska someday will be home to Christian renegades arriving for the Rapture.</i></p>
<p>Ah, yes – playing the Narrow-Minded Gap-Toothed Knuckle-Dragging Stupid Christianist Theocrat-on-the-Rampage card.  That&#8217;s the sort of bigoted nonsense we get in truckloads from the Far Left 24/7. Parker offers no proof of her allegations. Parker offers no proof of any kind.</p>
<p>And this:</p>
<p><i>I love Obama for his style, grace, intellect and his way with words. I want the healing power that an Obama presidency could deliver to this country.</i></p>
<p>Oh, brother!  Yes &#8211; Parker does go on to rip the Messiah in the same column, but the upshot of her piece is that the Chosen One is too <i>intellectual</i> to be President (too good for the country, perhaps?). She calls for Palin to be replaced for her supposed lack of aptitude and for her religious views (do we now have a religious test for office?). But not He Whose Middle Name Must Not Be Mentioned, whose name will be on all 57 states.</p>
<p>Remind me again how Parker is a conservative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grace</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/comment-page-2/#comment-96768</link>
		<dc:creator>grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 00:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/#comment-96768</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to add this, Bill Clinton was on the View, you know the show where all those liberal hosts spout off their different views on our world and the one exceptional conservative voice views? Well, any way, Bill said &quot; the first year a new president would LEARN his office, ... could he be talking about the office of president of United States? What do you mean Bill; a president must LEARN his office? He even said that all new presidents come in not knowing the job, you learn as you go. What!!! So, that means anyone can be president and you don’t have to have foreign policy experiences coming in the door? That is great to hear Bill. For a moment there I thought people who obviously never ran for office themselves for some reason think that the job of president and vice president are all knowing jobs, you come in knowing what to do off the back, hmmm. Sure some may have more experience than others, but if you can run a state you have some experience in leadership, don’t you think? Thanks Bill for the honesty!  We can use some of that in this country. Now, what bothers me Shawn about you and so many &quot;I’m a bible believing Christian” is, your little faith, your inability to realize that God’s thoughts and ways are not your ways. You want Sarah Palin on a pedestal looking perfect not messing up on any questions she maybe asked, after all she is representing the religious right. Instead she is being just herself, with all the flaws that I would expect for someone just excited to be ask to take the job would have. This is all new to her. I thought that being a Christian was being transparent? She may not be as polished and Barack Obama, Joe Biden and of course McCain, but I still like her. She brings something different to the table.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to add this, Bill Clinton was on the View, you know the show where all those liberal hosts spout off their different views on our world and the one exceptional conservative voice views? Well, any way, Bill said &#8221; the first year a new president would LEARN his office, &#8230; could he be talking about the office of president of United States? What do you mean Bill; a president must LEARN his office? He even said that all new presidents come in not knowing the job, you learn as you go. What!!! So, that means anyone can be president and you don’t have to have foreign policy experiences coming in the door? That is great to hear Bill. For a moment there I thought people who obviously never ran for office themselves for some reason think that the job of president and vice president are all knowing jobs, you come in knowing what to do off the back, hmmm. Sure some may have more experience than others, but if you can run a state you have some experience in leadership, don’t you think? Thanks Bill for the honesty!  We can use some of that in this country. Now, what bothers me Shawn about you and so many &#8220;I’m a bible believing Christian” is, your little faith, your inability to realize that God’s thoughts and ways are not your ways. You want Sarah Palin on a pedestal looking perfect not messing up on any questions she maybe asked, after all she is representing the religious right. Instead she is being just herself, with all the flaws that I would expect for someone just excited to be ask to take the job would have. This is all new to her. I thought that being a Christian was being transparent? She may not be as polished and Barack Obama, Joe Biden and of course McCain, but I still like her. She brings something different to the table.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RSG</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/comment-page-2/#comment-96767</link>
		<dc:creator>RSG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/#comment-96767</guid>
		<description>Non-traditional Americans = non-white people or those not classified as white.

Ah, nice try so called &quot;BigDoddy&quot;....by &quot;non-tradtional&quot;, I mean Barry Hussein barely qualifies as an American in my book.

I am for having higher standards and stricter rules on candidates for high office.  Barry&#039;s father and step-father were non-Americans and Moooslims and socialist/communist.  

Barry Hussein attended an Islamic madrassa in Indonesia - those are well known as radical Islamic factories of extremism, hate and jihad. 

I would allow only native born, US citizens, who&#039;s parents were also native born citizens to high office.  Immigrants (legal and illegal) often, not always but often have divided loyalties which include their old homeland.  

I&#039;m interested in US independence and sovereignty.  Period. 

Not a &quot;trans-national&quot; momma&#039;s boy search for why daddy and step-daddy deserted his whacked out hippie mother and himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Non-traditional Americans = non-white people or those not classified as white.</p>
<p>Ah, nice try so called &#8220;BigDoddy&#8221;&#8230;.by &#8220;non-tradtional&#8221;, I mean Barry Hussein barely qualifies as an American in my book.</p>
<p>I am for having higher standards and stricter rules on candidates for high office.  Barry&#8217;s father and step-father were non-Americans and Moooslims and socialist/communist.  </p>
<p>Barry Hussein attended an Islamic madrassa in Indonesia &#8211; those are well known as radical Islamic factories of extremism, hate and jihad. </p>
<p>I would allow only native born, US citizens, who&#8217;s parents were also native born citizens to high office.  Immigrants (legal and illegal) often, not always but often have divided loyalties which include their old homeland.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m interested in US independence and sovereignty.  Period. </p>
<p>Not a &#8220;trans-national&#8221; momma&#8217;s boy search for why daddy and step-daddy deserted his whacked out hippie mother and himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Brown</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/comment-page-2/#comment-96765</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/#comment-96765</guid>
		<description>Short points about foreign relations. 
Alaska was once Russian.
Islands between Alaska and Russia were invaded and occupied by Japan during WWII. Was not the mainland also attacked?
Alaska has resources desired by Russia and Russia is already staking claims in the waters north of Alaska.
What Alaskan, much less the governor, would not already be considering &quot;what ifs&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short points about foreign relations.<br />
Alaska was once Russian.<br />
Islands between Alaska and Russia were invaded and occupied by Japan during WWII. Was not the mainland also attacked?<br />
Alaska has resources desired by Russia and Russia is already staking claims in the waters north of Alaska.<br />
What Alaskan, much less the governor, would not already be considering &#8220;what ifs&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THEBIGDODDY</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/comment-page-2/#comment-96764</link>
		<dc:creator>THEBIGDODDY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/#comment-96764</guid>
		<description>CL,

What makes you think I&#039;m a Democrat or that I even like Susan Collins - OR like her because she sides with the Democrats?

What is this based on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CL,</p>
<p>What makes you think I&#8217;m a Democrat or that I even like Susan Collins &#8211; OR like her because she sides with the Democrats?</p>
<p>What is this based on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/comment-page-2/#comment-96761</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/#comment-96761</guid>
		<description>Sarah Palin lacks experience?  EXPERIENCE?!?!?!  I&#039;m watching a lot of experienced people in D.C. who have no clue what to do while the financial situation melts down.  I see experienced people without a hint of how dangerous the world is becoming and how they&#039;ve allowed events to get out of control.  I see experienced people asleep at the switch and allow us to get into the same energy fix we were in thirty years go.  Experience, yeah.  I support Sarah Palin because I sense intelligence, new ideas, integrity and backbone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah Palin lacks experience?  EXPERIENCE?!?!?!  I&#8217;m watching a lot of experienced people in D.C. who have no clue what to do while the financial situation melts down.  I see experienced people without a hint of how dangerous the world is becoming and how they&#8217;ve allowed events to get out of control.  I see experienced people asleep at the switch and allow us to get into the same energy fix we were in thirty years go.  Experience, yeah.  I support Sarah Palin because I sense intelligence, new ideas, integrity and backbone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracey</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/comment-page-2/#comment-96759</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/#comment-96759</guid>
		<description>While I agree that Sarah Palin does not have the foreign policy chops that I would like to see, I was thrilled by her pick because she does see the big picture in regards to our foolish and unnecessary dependence on foreign oil. To my knowledge, Senator Biden has never demonstrated the insight or even concern for this situation (nor Barack Obama) by introducing any piece of legislation that would rectify our crippling dependence. My impression of him is that his foreign policy experience is built on the world *as is*. I want someone like Sarah Palin who sees a different possibility and is willing to act on it, as she has demonstrated by finally getting that long-delayed gas pipeline deal done. I want American energy for a new independence day, namely, I want our foreign policy grounded on the freedom of choice and latitude we haven&#039;t had for decades. How much of our foreign policy is constrained and dictated by our dependence on unfriendly and undemocratic regimes for our energy needs? In my opinion, domestic energy production is *the big issue* of this election,because it directly affects our economy, national security, and foreign policy.I hope, in her debate with Senator Biden, Sarah Palin emphasizes this central issue along with the fact that when we achieve energy independence in a McCain/Palin administration, future foreign policy will, of necessity, be dramatically altered and *everyone* is going to have to learn and adjust to that new reality!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree that Sarah Palin does not have the foreign policy chops that I would like to see, I was thrilled by her pick because she does see the big picture in regards to our foolish and unnecessary dependence on foreign oil. To my knowledge, Senator Biden has never demonstrated the insight or even concern for this situation (nor Barack Obama) by introducing any piece of legislation that would rectify our crippling dependence. My impression of him is that his foreign policy experience is built on the world *as is*. I want someone like Sarah Palin who sees a different possibility and is willing to act on it, as she has demonstrated by finally getting that long-delayed gas pipeline deal done. I want American energy for a new independence day, namely, I want our foreign policy grounded on the freedom of choice and latitude we haven&#8217;t had for decades. How much of our foreign policy is constrained and dictated by our dependence on unfriendly and undemocratic regimes for our energy needs? In my opinion, domestic energy production is *the big issue* of this election,because it directly affects our economy, national security, and foreign policy.I hope, in her debate with Senator Biden, Sarah Palin emphasizes this central issue along with the fact that when we achieve energy independence in a McCain/Palin administration, future foreign policy will, of necessity, be dramatically altered and *everyone* is going to have to learn and adjust to that new reality!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BritishTongue</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/comment-page-2/#comment-96758</link>
		<dc:creator>BritishTongue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/#comment-96758</guid>
		<description>Well said mitchola but wait certain people on here will accuse you of being a palinbot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said mitchola but wait certain people on here will accuse you of being a palinbot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mitchola</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/comment-page-2/#comment-96757</link>
		<dc:creator>mitchola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/#comment-96757</guid>
		<description>sarah palin went and visited troops in the gulf before Obama didn&#039;t; Obama didn&#039;t visit until he was running for president. Sarah Palin went when she sent her National Guard over there</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sarah palin went and visited troops in the gulf before Obama didn&#8217;t; Obama didn&#8217;t visit until he was running for president. Sarah Palin went when she sent her National Guard over there</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CL</title>
		<link>http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/comment-page-2/#comment-96753</link>
		<dc:creator>CL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 21:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/09/26/sarah-palins-foreign-policy-flame-out/#comment-96753</guid>
		<description>CL,

Susan Collins is a Republican. Did you even read the Wiki?

Comment by THEBIGDODDY — 
____________________

I can barely stand your condescending attitude. OF COURSE I KNOW SHE&quot;S A REPUBLICAN. And I did not have to read Wiki to find that out. I guess you think everyone but you is an idiot. She has a reputation of quite frequently siding with the Democrats, but of course you know (but don&#039;t mention it) and thats why you like her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CL,</p>
<p>Susan Collins is a Republican. Did you even read the Wiki?</p>
<p>Comment by THEBIGDODDY —<br />
____________________</p>
<p>I can barely stand your condescending attitude. OF COURSE I KNOW SHE&#8221;S A REPUBLICAN. And I did not have to read Wiki to find that out. I guess you think everyone but you is an idiot. She has a reputation of quite frequently siding with the Democrats, but of course you know (but don&#8217;t mention it) and thats why you like her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

