Actor Chuck Norris, Christian and Republican, reminds us in “I’m Voting for Those Not Yet Born” of Barack Obama’s record on the protection of unborn life.
If Obama wins, we’ll have a man in the White House who voted multiple times against a bill that would protect babies born alive during abortions. We’ll have a man in the White House who supports infanticide. We’ll have a man in the White House who voted against a bill that would require a doctor to notify a parent or guardian before killing a minor’s unborn child in another state. If elected president, Obama said he’d make it his “first priority” to legalize child killing.
I’ve heard from people who say that being pro-choice isn’t the same as being pro-death. They believe, for whatever misguided reason, that women have the freedom to snuff out the life growing inside them. They take offense at being called “pro-death” or “anti-life.” But that’s exactly what they are. There’s no wiggle room. If you believe women have a right to kill their unborn babies, you are pro-death.
In contrast, I don’t recoil when someone calls me “anti-abortion” or “anti-choice.” Darn right. I am not ashamed to wear both labels anytime, anywhere, in the stark light of day.
As Norris says, abortion isn’t about a woman’s so-called right to choose:
“[I]t is about a more fundamental ‘right to life,’ which is one of three specifically identified unalienable rights in the Declaration of Independence (and the Constitution, through Article VII and the Bill of Rights). And it is a violation of government’s primary purpose: to protect innocent life.”
It’s important to note the “innocent” part. This is what distinguishes killing an unborn child from executing murderer.
Around 11:15 a.m. ET, I’m appearing on Doug Giles’s radio show to talk about why people who call themselves evangelical Christians plan to vote for the infanticide-supporting Obama. I’m no expert, but that’s never stopped me before!
Addendum: I’m not crazy about John McCain. In fact, I couldn’t be more disappointed with the Republican party’s choice of nominee. But that’s spilled milk under the bridge. Vote for him…unless you want a man in the White House who intends to re-write the Constitution. It’s not hyperbole.
Related post:
