April 2010

From pastor, apologist, debater, author, and blogger James White‘s Christian Research Journal article, “An Eye for An Eye? Exodus and Abortion”:

premature baby“Scott Klusendorf has presented several excellent pro-life arguments in his feature article in this issue of the Journal based upon the hypothetical ‘given’ that Scripture is silent on the issue of abortion. Many scholars, however, believe Scripture does, in fact, address the issue, even if not explicitly. Scripture provides us with principles that, through the exercise of godly wisdom, can be applied to the wide variety of situations we encounter in modern culture. In the realm of human behavior, there is ‘nothing new under the sun,’ and the Bible, written by One who knows the human heart intimately, does indeed speak to every aspect of human life, including our thoughts, our actions, and our beliefs.

“The value of human life as something special, a gift from God, is found throughout Scripture. The commandment not to murder carries with it the corollary responsibility to save and honor life. Many today dismiss the influence of God’s moral law on the nations of the West. The laws of most of those nations, nevertheless, are steeped in the recognition of such things as ‘inalienable rights’ — inalienable because they are derived from our Creator. One such inalienable right is life.

“The story of how Western civilizations have departed from a high view of human life to the current view that justifies infanticide is sad and complex; indeed, modern Western culture has sanctified a form of infanticide. Abortion is internal infanticide: the murder of a child at the most vulnerable time of life — those precious months when the child develops and grows while sheltered in the womb. There is no medical, philosophical, theological, or rational difference between the violent murder of an infant who has lived long enough to travel down the birth canal and the same infant separated by a small period of time or a space measurable in inches. Undeniable facts, knowable to anyone who inquires into the subject, establish the humanity and personhood of the infant in the womb. Modern society, however, preferring sexual license to truth and morality, has sanctioned infanticide under the more palatable term ‘abortion’ and the even more wishful phrase ‘termination of pregnancy.’ So committed are the proponents of intrauterine infanticide that the procedure known as “partial-birth abortion,” an act comparable to the mass murders the Nazis committed at Auschwitz and Dachau, is unashamedly protected and defended at all political and moral cost by many of the highest leaders in government.

“The passage of time has only added to the guilt of destroying our young. Our advancing technology now allows us to peer directly into the womb and observe the wonder of the developing child. We now know, beyond question, that the preborn child is an individual human being who possesses a unique genetic code. Anyone who uses terms like ‘mass of tissue’ to describe the preborn child is engaging in sophistry, for the facts demonstrate beyond all doubt his or her humanity and individuality. These facts are so compelling on any logical, scientific, or forensic level that the proponents of abortion, in general, seek to avoid, at all costs, direct and fair debate with those who oppose abortion and who are well prepared to make their case.”

Read the full article.

Update: Being in the U.S. illegally is a civil offense, as it turns out, not a criminal one. But it’s still against the law. Illegal aliens are breaking the law. I can’t emphasize that enough.

Arizona has done something marvelously radical. Arizona has made it a crime to be in Arizona illegally. The headline is correct, but for clarity, it should read: “AZ makes it a state crime to be an illegal immigrant.” I think the feds should follow suit, don’t you?

Check out the federal code. I’ve discussed this on my blog before, something about entering the U.S. illegally is a crime, but being here illegally isn’t. How they work that out, I don’t know. A lot of parsing to do, but it won’t be today! Lots of discussion on my Facebook thread.
—————————————————————————-

I don’t have time for this (deadlines!). Paying work is a priority, but I simply had to post this. Check out this headline from ABC or AP or whatever:

Ignorance abounds! See the madness with your own eyes. An illegal “immigrant” is in violation of the law. Being in the U.S. illegally is a crime. An illegal immigrant’s status is lawbreaker. You see, illegal means not legal. Not legal means illegal. A broken law. You follow?

This is so dumb, it’s giving me a headache. Back to work!

By the way, the absurd headline reminds me of African-American Canadians. Remember them?

Update: Posts like this are incompatible with my goal to place my work in certain secular (and even some Christian) publications. It’s better to have a lower or at least politically correct profile. But still I write posts like this, and the archives are here to stay. (I was edgier back in the day.) I’ll let God sort it out. ;)

By the way, read Byron York’s latest: “The fact is, since the 1940s, federal law has required non-citizens in this country to carry, on their person, the documentation proving they are here legally — green card, work visa, etc. That hasn’t changed.”

So how is asking to see the documentation a violation?
——————————————————————-

I used to be really angry about the way politicians were running this country. I used to be really angry when people made assumptions about me based on the color of my skin. I used to be really angry when readers and other bloggers said and wrote nasty things about me because I had a different opinion, the incorrect opinion. And nothing made me angrier than when black readers said I should shut up and go away because I was dangerous or self-hating or stupid or ugly or all four.

The anger was fuel that kept me writing, speaking, and going against the grain. It was invigorating. I wasn’t contrary for the sake of being contrary. I truly believe, will always believe, that conservatism is better for the country, and that liberalism degrades.

I’ve mellowed in middle age. Thank you, Lord! I’m not nearly as angry as I once was. Yes, politicians are still ruining the country. People still make assumptions based on the color of my skin. People still say and write nasty things about me. What’s changed?

It’s simple. First, I started trusting God more than men. That’s what Christians are supposed to do, but being fallen human beings, we give other fallen human beings too much credit. These days, instead of keeping my faith in a box and pulling it out when reading and studying the Bible or talking about it with others or attending church, I wear it like a pendant around my neck. Second, I stopped caring so much.

Some Christians are happy about Obama’s election, regardless of his views on child killing,  for instance, because he’s black (half, actually). Too sad for words. I used to seethe just thinking about the level of ignorance among people who seem to care nothing about an individual’s values, only his race. But the seething dissipated, thank God.

When I look at a person, politician or regular Joe, the first thing I want to know is whether he’s a Christian, a Bible-believing Christian. (There’s a difference.) Character follows. Is it high or low? (If he’s a Christian, his character is high, yes? Not necessarily, unfortunately. We’re still sinners.) For example, does the person cheat on his/her spouse? If he’s a Christian, does he believe babies born during botched abortions should be left to die? Does the self-labeled Christian call himself pro-choice? Next thing I want to know is whether he’s conservative politically, especially socially. The color of his skin has no part to play in my assessment. If you’re a conservative Christian with high character, you’re golden.

What precipitated this mini-rant? Pat Buchanan. Reading his latest this morning got me riled up a bit. Just a bit. Fully rested from last night’s sleep, lying in bed at pre-dawn and browsing the headlines on the Droid before I got up, I read “Whose country is this?” and felt a twinge of nostalgia. This is one of the reasons I started blogging.

Buchanan writes about Arizona’s new law to deal with illegal aliens, as the federal government has abdicated its constitutional duty to deal with illegal aliens. He writes:

We have a crisis in Arizona because we have a failed state in Washington.

What is the response of Barack Obama, who took an oath to see to it that federal laws are faithfully executed?

He is siding with the law-breakers. He is pandering to the ethnic lobbies. He is not berating a Mexican regime that aids and abets this invasion of the country of which he is commander in chief. Instead, he attacks the government of Arizona for trying to fill a gaping hole in law enforcement left by his own dereliction of duty.

He has denounced Arizona as “misguided.” He has called on the Justice Department to ensure that Arizona’s sheriffs and police do not violate anyone’s civil rights. But he has said nothing about the rights of the people of Arizona who must deal with the costs of having hundreds of thousands of lawbreakers in their midst.

The state has a fiscal crisis caused in part by the burden of providing schooling and social welfare for illegals and their families, who consume far more in services than they pay in taxes and who continue to pour in. Even John McCain is now calling for 3,000 troops on the border.

Police officers and a prominent rancher have been murdered. There have been kidnappings believed to be tied to the Mexican drug cartels. There are nightly high-speed chases through the barrios where innocent people are constantly at risk.

If Arizona does not get control of the border and stop the invasion, U.S. citizens will stop coming to Arizona and will begin to depart, as they are already fleeing California.

What we are talking about here is the Balkanization and breakup of a nation into ethnic enclaves. A country that cannot control its borders isn’t really a country anymore, Ronald Reagan reminded us.

The tasks that Arizonans are themselves undertaking are ones that belong by right, the Constitution and federal law to the Border Patrol, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and Homeland Security.

At this point some of you liberals might be wondering why this makes me angry. Conservatives know, because they feel it, too. Here we have Barack Obama, a man who is a duly elected commander in chief of the greatest country on the planet, who swore to uphold the Constitution, which provides for protection of the states from invasion. And what does he have to say about Arizona’s burdened citizens? He called them misguided and announced an intent to protect illegal aliens’ civil rights. What about the constitutional rights of American citizens? Meh.

The implicit message is that Arizona is some kind of fascist state, overwhelmed law enforcement officers, dead rancher and border agents, and frustrated residents be damned. Arizona, Obama doesn’t care about you. He aims to protect the illegal aliens, not the people he actually has a duty to protect.

After the law passed, I watched an evening newscast. I saw an overweight, bespectacled, shirt-and-tie-wearing, office-working, no-accented Hispanic on the news implying, with a straight face, that the cops would stop someone like him and ask to see his papers. Har-har-har. In the old days, I’d have had the urge to throw whatever was in my hand at the TV.

Whose country is this? In our backward society, a taxpaying, law-abiding American citizen who complains about border-jumpers in our midst is branded a xenophobe. We live in a society where people can jump the border or overstay visas, in clear violation of our country’s laws, and our president turns not on the lawbreakers, but on his own people. We elected him to protect us, not the invader. How did this happen?

Whose country is this? In our biblically illiterate society, some Christians imply that others who want illegal aliens to be prosecuted and/or deported are un-Christ-like. Does the same hold for the murderer? The armed robber? The rapist? The tax cheat? Are we reading the same Bible? What if the lawbreaker were a Christian…should the law hold him to a different standard because he’s a Christian? Some illegal aliens call themselves Christians. How do they and their Christian advocates reconcile breaking the law and expecting special treatment with biblical teachings to obey the law?

Are immigration laws unjust? Is it unbiblical for a country to create immigration laws and enforce its own borders? I’m patiently waiting for someone to make the biblical argument. E-mail me.

If I hadn’t witnessed this ignorance firsthand, I would not have believed it.

George Bush lost me on illegal “immigration.” I was deeply disappointed that a man I voted for pushed amnesty for illegal aliens.” “What about the people waiting in line to become citizens the legal way!” I shouted. I took it personally. Bush pushed the bill so hard, despite grumblings from the base, I suspected Mexico’s president had something on him. I still do.

This is the best I can do as a rant these days. God is running this world the way he sees fit, even if it makes little sense to me. Nothing pleases God more than my trust and faith in him. The Bible says so. That doesn’t mean Christians can’t act. We are to act in the world and advance the Kingdom within it. But we don’t need to run ourselves ragged worrying about the world. One thing we know for certain: He wins. Keep that in mind as you read/watch our leaders protect the foreigner and the lawbreaker over the native and the law-abider.

For my sanity, peace of mind, and physical health, I’m off he-said/she-said politics and focused on topics that don’t make me angry*, that I enjoy, and that are pleasing to God.

*I blog about child killing a lot these days, and child killing makes me angry. I have faith it's a God-pleasing, life-saving anger.

Joseph and Obamacare

by La Shawn on 04.26.10

in General

The story of Joseph in the Book of Genesis is an unequivocal display of God’s sovereignty.

Joseph was his father Jacob’s favorite child. Hey, it happens, right, parents? Naturally, Joseph’s many brothers were jealous. On top of that, Joseph told them about a dream he’d had, in which his sheaves of grain stood tall, while theirs bowed down before his.

“Do you intend to reign over us,” the brothers asked. “Will you actually rule us?”

One day they plotted to kill Joseph. The oldest brother discouraged this idea and said, “Throw him into this cistern here in the desert, but don’t lay a hand on him.” When Joseph showed up, they threw him into the cistern. While they were eating lunch, a caravan rode by, heading to Egypt. The brothers sold Joseph to these men, who in turn sold him as a slave in Egypt.

There’s a bright side: God showed him favor. Joseph ended up interpreting one of Pharaoh’s dreams, which forecasted seven years of plentiful crops and seven years of famine. Egypt needed to gather and store grain during the plentiful years and ration it during the famine years. Pharaoh was so grateful, he appointed Joseph to a high position and put him in charge of gathering food from among the people. When the famine came, Egypt had enough food to sell to others.

Joseph’s brothers went down to Egypt to buy food, not knowing the man they appealed to was the brother they’d sold. Long story short, they all made amends, and Joseph saved his father, brothers, their families, and many others from starving. After their father Jacob died, the brothers were worried Joseph would seek revenge.

“Don’t be afraid,” he said. “Am I in the place of God? You intended to harm me, but God intended it for good to accomplish what is now being done, the saving of many lives.”

For the whole story, see Genesis 37 through 50.

Joseph came to mind when I read a story in USA Today:

“Dozens of states are passing or debating new restrictions on abortion, a trend fueled in part by passage of the nation’s new health care law.”

BabyWhile Obamacare may not rise to the level of evil, it’s an expensive and unpopular law. It’s one step closer to socialized medicine, a fate the U.S. so far has managed to avoid. But once insurance companies start going out of business, what’s left? Why, government insurance, of course! If you don’t see the problem with government running the health care system, you’re probably a liberal. Sorry.

But, as the USA Today article implies, the law has motivated state legislatures to get their collective butt in gear and start drafting and pushing bills that increase abortion counseling, and expand waiting periods and the use of ultrasound. Nebraska’s new abortion restriction law helps.

Counseling, waiting periods, and images of their unborn babies won’t stop all abortion-minded women from killing them, but these things will influence some to slow down and consider alternatives like adoption.

Joseph’s story is one of many that shows God’s sovereign hand in the affairs of men. If the blasted health care “reform” law leads to state laws discouraging child killing, so be it.

Addendum: God promised Jacob that his descendants would be as numerous as the dust of the earth. Do you see the part Joseph’s slavery in Egypt plays in fulfilling that promise?

What Does Nebraska’s New Law Mean for Roe? – Updated

April 21, 2010

Nebraska’s new abortion restriction law may signal a paradigm shift in the abortion debate. The current standard for whether the state can interfere with a woman’s right to kill her baby derives from Roe v. Wade: viability. If the unborn baby can survive outside the womb, the state has a compelling interest to protect that [...]

Read the full article →

Arizona Does Federal Government’s Job

April 20, 2010

Update (4/23): Governor Jan Brewer does the right thing. Law enforcement officers in Arizona are required to ask a suspect about his immigration status if there’s a “reasonable suspicion,” and it’s a crime to transport illegal aliens and to hire day laborers. Glenn Reynolds: “Were I representing Arizona, I’d argue that the federal government is [...]

Read the full article →

Abortionist Kills ‘Wrong’ Baby

April 15, 2010

In 2006, a woman about 15 weeks pregnant (in vitro) with fraternal twins opted to kill the baby with Down syndrome. The “doctor” mistakenly injected poison into the chromosomally normal baby. Rather than keep the remaining baby, however, the mother had him killed, too. Last weekend, the medical board revoked the doctor’s license. He was [...]

Read the full article →

Milwaukee Planned Parenthood Lies About Fetal Development

April 13, 2010

How can one make responsible decisions about medical procedures when “health care” workers lie to them? A Planned Parenthood worker in Milwaukee tells a “pregnant” woman she’s about six to eight weeks pregnant. When the girl asks about “the baby,” the worker says there’s no baby at this point. There are no identifiable parts. There [...]

Read the full article →

Nevada Group Pushes Personhood Amendment

April 6, 2010

“The real question today is not when human life begins, but, What is the value of human life? The abortionist who reassembles the arms and legs of a tiny baby to make sure all its parts have been torn from its mother’s body can hardly doubt whether it is a human being. The real question [...]

Read the full article →

The Bodily Resurrection of Christ

April 2, 2010

Adrian Warnock and I go way back. A pastor and an M.D. in London, Adrian started the Blogdom of God a long time ago in web years – maybe 2003. His aggregator raised my profile, and my blog consistently ranked near the top. In his new book, Raised with Christ: How the Resurrection Changes Everything, [...]

Read the full article →

No en Honduras

April 1, 2010

Not in Honduras, folks. It’s just jokes! Check the calendar. If I fooled you, raise your hand. Previous April Fools’ Day posts: LBC Shutting Down — to deal with water phobia – yep, some fell for it Outsourcers Anonymous Secrets – my best, I think

Read the full article →

My New Home

April 1, 2010

Over the years, I’ve shared quite a bit with readers. For the last six months, however, I’ve been hiding something. Well, not really hiding. It is my personal business. But, I said to myself, what’s the big deal? I’ve left Southern California. Yes, I moved again, but you’ll never guess where. Scroll down for details:

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Read the full article →