Check out this Reuters story about “Lila Rose,” the college student who poses as a pregnant teen knocked up by her adult boyfriend and captures Planned Parenthood workers failing to report what’s presented to them as statutory rape and in some cases, encouraging her to lie about it.
U.S. News and World Report blogger Bonnie Erbe wants to know why the pro-life crusader hasn’t been arrested for trespassing or fraud, and – get this – Planned Parenthood has posted Lila Rose’s picture so its disgraceful workers will be on the alert.
#1: On the alert for what? As long as PP reports statutory rapes and stops encouraging teenagers to lie about it, what difference does it make who comes into the mill? Whether a sting operation or the real deal, as long as PP workers do what they’re required to do by law (and common decency, for crying out loud), what’s the problem? Unless they plan on continuing the “you rape ‘em, we muzzle ‘em” policy.
#2 – Instead of posting Lila Rose’s face on the wall, how about posting pics of the women who failed to report the rapes, alerting girls and women seeking “services” to stay clear of workers who’ll not only allow abuse to continue, but advise them to keep their mouths shut, too?
I usually don’t name-call, but I’m in a skeptical, name-calling mood.
I just found out that Planned Parenthood workers in Arizona who covered up what they thought was statutory rape – then encouraged the victim to lie about it – didn’t think they were required to report such rapes because they’re not “medical professionals.” (Source)
Liars, the big fat kind.
Under Arizona law, “physical and mental health providers,” among others, are required to report statutory rape to Child Protective Services. Did these women honestly think only doctors and nurses were required to report the abuse of a child but not the person asking questions, giving advice, and setting up abortion appointments? I don’t buy it for one minute. Assuming they did believe such an obviously hare-brained idea, that would make them too stupid to work even in a child killing “clinic.”
The workers either took advantage of the medical-professional loophole in the law or honestly believed they were not required to report statutory rapes. Relying on your common sense, which do you think is more likely? A county prosecutor in Arizona says the law should be changed to expressly state who is obligated to report statutory rapes. We’re a country of morons, aren’t we?
Pro-aborts are so in love with fetal death, they’re willing to excuse the abuse of children and allow it to continue to preserve the child’s so-called right to get rid to “it.” Shameful on so many levels, it’s not even worth elaborating on.
I LOVE it. As pro-infanticide Barack Obama talked around his support for abortion, you can hear a baby crying in the audience. The video’s sound is quite low, but you can still hear the crying:
Obama appears rattled by the crying at some point. I hope conviction shot through his soul like a cannon blast. Perhaps he only winced. Whatever. Every little bit helps.
Sorry, Barack. When it comes to abortion, there is no “common effort,” “good will,” or “vigorous debate” for me. Unlike you, a supporter of child killing, whether it means tearing the baby from the womb via vacuum suction or partially delivering the baby then sucking out its brain, I think it’s heinous, deplorable, and reprehensible. No amount of double-talk or can’t-we-all-just-get-along rhetoric will ever change the horrible facts of snuffing out innocent life.
Nothing says Happy Mother’s Day like a gift in honor of your mother to an organization that makes sure a woman doesn’t become a mother.
In honor of dear mothers everywhere, author Judy Blume, whose books I read as an adolescent, lends her hefty name to the abortion mill Planned Parenthood to solicit donations. As a writer, Blume certainly understands irony. Hello?
After a flood of “hate” mail to Blume, PP’s begging other pro-deathers to back up the author. President Cecile Richards said, “We rarely respond to these outrageous attacks, but when it comes to Judy Blume … well, I can’t stand by and do nothing. Please, let her know how much we appreciate her courage.”
It is outrageous, says the killer of the unborn, for “anti-choice extremists” to express their displeasure not only about the slaughter of babies but to also criticize a very important person like Blume, who’s using her name toward the cause of baby murder.
My mother told me her grandmother told a story about a woman who’d had several abortions during her childbearing years. On her deathbed, the woman said she could hear her babies crying. Delirium? Probably. But still.
By the way, thanks again for the many birthday wishes and other kind words.
Up to 16 weeks of pregnancy, a procedure called vacuum aspiration is used to kill babies. After 16 weeks, abortionists kill babies using a procedure called dilation and evacuation. After 20 weeks, the killing of an unborn baby is euphemistically called partial-birth abortion. To avoid murder charges, the abortionist partially delivers the baby, leaving the head inside. A probe is inserted into the baby’s skull to kill him.
(Between the 16th and 24th weeks, “doctors” sometime perform saline abortions. A solution is injected into the uterus to produce contractions to expel the baby. Dead on arrival.)
What else could account for Planned Parenthood workers protecting grown men and further harming young girls by failing to report statutory rape? If you’ve got a better answer, let me know. From the press release:
“In a conversation recorded earlier this week between a 14-year-old girl and a Planned Parenthood employee, the employee is informed that the young girl believes she may be pregnant by her 23-year-old boyfriend. Planned Parenthood invites the young girl to the clinic for a pregnancy test and possible contraceptive services – and informs the young victim that her sexual abuser can come to the clinic to pick up the contraceptives. At no point does the employee raise any concerns about sexual abuse, despite the fact that the situation described constitutes Aggravated Indecent Liberties under Kansas law.”
As blogger and former labor and delivery nurse Jill Stanek notes, this latest allegation against the abortion mill comes in the midst of high-profile coverage of its dastardly deeds.
Brain cells die ignoble deaths, and the soul’s erosion continues apace.
The work of “Lila Rose,” the young woman who caught several Planned Parenthood abortion mills red-handed (pun intended) covering up statutory rape, is featured in the Los Angeles Times.
The article is biased in favor of abortion and against Lila Rose’s tactics, but I’m not hating on the Times. I’m surprised and quite pleased the mainstream newspaper wrote about the cover-ups at all. Hey, be grateful for small things. The more people who’re aware of Planned Parenthood’s stupendously hare-brained activity, the better.
The biased term “antiabortion” is used throughout the article. Obviously, the author believes abortion is okay. Otherwise, why not use “pro-life”? Because it shines a bright, revealing light on what abortion is: the death of a fetus. And pro-deathers prefer not to think of a fetus as a living human worthy of life.
Did you catch my bias? I call “pro-choice” people “pro-deathers.” I wear my bias on my sleeve and in my heart. I am neither impressed by sentiments nor persuaded by arguments that women should retain the right to kill their babies on demand. For whatever reason.
I am biased in favor of unborn life, not allowing women to snuff out that life because they don’t want “it.” Most mainstream media types are leftists who support atrocities like abortion, and it shows in how they choose to frame a story. I used to rant and rave about it. But I do the same thing. It’s human nature. Why fight it? I’m willing to give readers credit for being smarter than reporters (and freelance writers) think they are.
Much like its counterpart in Arizona, Planned Parenthood in Memphis, Tennessee, encourages a girl who says her adult boyfriend knocked her up to lie about it.
Lila Rose, an adult posing as a minor, caught an abortion mill worker on tape saying, “Look, if we keep this conversation I’m gonna have to talk to my manager and yeah, [your boyfriend]’s gonna get in trouble…And please don’t say that I told you this…Don’t mention it. Just say you have a boyfriend 17 years old…whatever.”
Lila Rose goes undercover to expose this atrocity, but there have been real cases of PP workers covering up rape. In 2002, a judge found Planned Parenthood of Arizona negligent for failing to report the rape of 13-year-old girl by her 23-year-old foster brother, who brought the girl to the clinic twice in a six-month period. Too ridiculous for words.
One would think feminists who work in these mills and their “sisters” who support child killing on demand would be outraged even by the possibility that an adult male could get away with raping a female minor.
The Fetus Hater of the Month award goes to Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL/Pro-Choice America, for calling Virginia governor Tim Kaine’s decision to allow “Choose Life” license plates “divisive political ideology.” (Source)
Congratulations, Nancy! I thought I’d take a moment to recognize all you don’t do to protect unborn life. But I’m being modest! The slaughter of babies is no small feat. (Bad pun?)
Ever since the Supreme Court wrenched a phantom “right to privacy” from the Constitution, a right that includes the murder of children, incidentally, you and your sisters-in-arms have been working diligently to make sure no “unwanted” fetus goes “unshredded” or “untorn.” Rights of the unborn? Not on your watch, right Nancy?
Oh, to be a proverbial fly on the wall when you meet your Maker. Sing along, everybody, to a song of liberation and sisterhood (and try to ignore the ironic birth references):
Okay, I see why some people would want to kill a fetus. Some believe he/she has no rights until he/she is viable. Others believe the mother’s right to do with her body as she pleases trumps everything. Reasons for wanting to kill a fetus vary from the most well-meaning (fetal deformity or life of the mother at stake) to the most evil (Just get rid of the thing!).
But I’ll never understand why grown “feminist” women overtly cover up the rape of young girls. Yes, that is more puzzling to me than condoning the slaughter of an unborn child.
I don’t care how developed their bodies may be. What does a 15-year-old understand about the consequences of opening herself up to an exploitive adult male whose only intent is to get as much as he can from a still-forming, naïve young girl who thinks she’s a woman? Feminists, more than anybody, should be all over Planned Parenthood for not only allowing the exploitation to continue, but for encouraging girls to lie about it. Aren’t feminists against the exploitation of women??? Good grief.
Perhaps the pathological disregard for unborn babies causes some “pro-choice” people to also disregard long-term consequences to a young girl of being taken advantage of by a grown man. The fetus if the focus. Everything and everyone else can go to hell.
In 2002, Planned Parenthood of Arizona failed to report the rape of 13-year-old girl by her 23-year-old foster brother, who brought the girl to the clinic twice in a six-month period!
Lila Rose, a college student and pro-life crusader, poses as a minor to catch Planned Parenthood employees covering up statutory rapes. In the latest episode, Jackie Stollar of Live Action Films posed as a 15-year-old impregnated by her 27-year-old boyfriend, and Planned Parenthood did not report the rape. In fact, an employer told her that “everything is confidential” and that she wouldn’t say a word:
George Tiller, a child killer facing numerous criminal charges for performing illegal “partial birth” abortions in Kansas — and who admitted killing babies a day before the mother’s due date — is scheduled for trial on March 23. (Source)
It’s not what you think. Tiller isn’t going to trial for the killings per se; he’s charged with failing to have a second, independent “physician” sign off on the infanticide.
Sometimes during infanticide procedures, babies slip out of the womb alive, which Tiller calls “sloppy medicine.” Thank God groups like Operation Rescue are praying for Tiller’s salvation. Because if it were left up to me…
Remember that *beep* abortion worker who tossed a live baby in a biohazard bag and suffocated her? I mentioned it in Christian Thinking Bad Thoughts.
Belkis Gonzalez was arrested yesterday for “practicing medicine without a license” and other charges. Instead of trying to save the baby, she did her job and continued the process. Don’t miss this: killing a baby is considered practicing medicine. Anyway, the woman who scheduled her unborn child’s death sued the clinic for — get this — wrongful death. Women suing abortion clinics for killing babies raises all sorts of implications. Abortion clinics exist for the purpose of killing babies. So when a clinic kills a baby, the mother can sue the clinic for killing her baby?
The woman suing says her baby was murdered. As I wrote in the earlier post, tearing a baby to pieces, vacuuming her out of the womb, and rinsing her down a sink isn’t murder, but dumping a baby who survived the killing is murder. Pro-child killing types see a distinction in this scenario that I don’t. Whether in the womb or outside it, the baby is a living creature, a human being God knitted together. Snuffing out that life, even if the baby isn’t viable outside the womb at that point, is the killing of an innocent and should be punishable by law.
It’s too good to be true and likely won’t become a law, but for now, it’s golden. North Dakota lawmakers just passed a bill (51 to 41) that defines a fertilized egg as a human being with all the rights of a “person.” (Source)
While it didn’t take a bill to declare a fertilized egg human (because it is human, as opposed to canine), the language of the measure directly challenges Roe v. Wade.
If the state senate passes the bill, it won’t become law unless the governor signs it. The bill outlaws abortion; that’s why the governor won’t sign it. Selfish, irresponsible, and amoral men and women will fight like hell to keep child killing legal, and too many judges (and governors) agree with Roe’s tortured ruling. Supreme Court justices found a way to justify murder by declaring that the Constitution contains a “right to privacy” (which it does not) that includes killing babies in utero.
If I were queen of the world, I’d outlaw child killing at all stages of pregnancy. Once a woman made the decision to have intercourse, her choices were made. The choice she has once a human being is growing inside her is to carry the baby to term, be a parent to him, or give him to an intact family.
Since I’m not queen of the world, the best I hope for is: 1) Roe is overturned; 2) people will give generously to pregnancy crisis centers that talk women out of killing their children and offer financial and psychological help. Most of all I hope: 3) churches make this a high priority issue; 4) Christ followers warn these lost women of the consequences of this and other sins and; 5) Christ followers tell them how to avoid God’s just punishment.
Abortion mills sure love the “choice” afforded women and girls in this country. In fact, they’re so eager to suck out that fetus, they forget to do things like call the police after minors tell them adult males impregnated them. They’re so hot for death, they fail to protect vulnerable young girls. Obeying the law is a pain in the butt sometimes. Or in this case, a pain in the gut.
UCLA student and pro-life activist Lila Rose of Live Action Films has caught on tape an abortion mill worker encouraging who she believes is a 15-year-old girl not to bring her 27-year-old “boyfriend” to a hearing required to waive parental consent to kill her baby. Does the nurse report the rape? No.
The abortion mill supposedly is investigating the situation. It’s investigating itself. Very useful! “We are conducting an internal, fact-based review to ensure that all our high standards of care and legal obligations have been met,” wrote Rachel Chánes, vice president of community services for Planned Parenthood Arizona.
Yeah, whatever.
In 2002, a judge found Planned Parenthood of Arizona negligent for failing to report the rape of a 13-year-old girl by her 23-year-old foster brother. You won’t believe this, but he brought her to the clinic to have the baby killed. Planned Parenthood’s silence led to continued abuse and a second abortion six months later.
Most ironically, Arizona’s top cop, Attorney General Terry Goddard, is scheduled to deliver the keynote speech at an event sponsored by Planned Parenthood. The highest prosecuting official in the state is speaking at an event financed by an organization that breaks state law covering up the rape of young girls. Nice. His mother must be proud.
Christians aren’t supposed to wish that certain people were going to hell or to show hostility in public, lest it might ruin our testimonies and/or turn people away from Christ. At the risk of ruining mine and repelling the unrepentant, let me say publicly on this blog that I wish something very, very bad happens to the heartless idiots involved in throwing away a living baby born during a “botched” abortion. (Source)
I’m late on this, and you probably know the facts. An 18-year-old exercised her “right” to kill her unborn child. Sycloria Williams was 22 (or 23, depending on the source) weeks pregnant. She’d met with the “doctor” days before, and he gave her drugs to dilate her cervix for an easier kill. The next day she went to a clinic for the slaughter. She was given meds to induce labor.
Five hours later, with no abortionist present, she gave birth to a girl. Employee Belkis Gonzalez (Oh, the language I want to use right now!) cut the umbilical cord and didn’t clamp it. I read somewhere that the baby was writhing and struggling to breathe. Good Lord. Gonzalez put the living child into a biohazard bag that contained a “caustic chemical.” You can read the rest. I’m trying not to lose my religion.
It doesn’t matter whether a 23-week-old fetus is viable. The point is there was chance for that baby to live. Former labor and delivery nurse and blogger Jill Stanek has more.
Blah, blah, blah, the doctor didn’t have a medical license. He was sued for medical malpractice. Frankly, I don’t care. Here’s what I don’t get: Williams went to the clinic for an abortion, but she’s now suing her abortionist for murdering her child. Wait…what? So if the killer had torn the baby to pieces vacuuming her out of the womb and rinsing her down a sink, that wouldn’t have been murder? Murder committed in the womb is choice, but murder committed outside the womb is…?
(Pictured: baby at 23 weeks)
This child killing is a bad business, to understate it, and I’m sickened every time I hear the freaking word choice in the context of this heinous act. Yeah, I know I’m supposed to say, “May God have mercy on your soul” or share the Gospel with these lost souls or something sweet like that. But you know what? I’m going to spend the next few hours imagining these people stuttering before God as they try to explain themselves.
I, too, am a sinner and undeserving of God’s forgiveness. But God saw fit to send his Son Jesus Christ to bear the punishment for my sins. Because of his blood, I won’t get what I deserve. Perhaps he’ll have mercy on the fools involved in this case. Sin is sin.
Why did he choose me? I don’t know. I’ll ask him one day.
Addendum: A Twitter follower writes: “Deut 27:25 ‘Cursed is the man who accepts a bribe to kill an innocent person.’ – No need for us to wish bad for them.”