Sex Preferences

Mammary Breaks

by La Shawn on 09.13.07

in Lunacy, Sex Preferences

Rosie the RiveterNow see, this is why I have problems with women who have newborns and go back to work.

I’ve got the inside scoop. When some people say they want “equal treatment,” they’re not being truthful. Take it from a “double minority.” I know what I’m talking about. What they want is accommodation and special treatment. Like this woman.

She’s taking a medical licensing exam, which allows a total of 45 minutes for breaks. This chick, nursing her four-month-old, is suing the National Board of Medical Examiners for extra time to feed the kid and pump milk. This woman has already received special treatment. She’s allowed to take the test over two days, while everybody else gets only one day. Now she wants to expand break time.

*Sigh* Silly girls wearing stethoscopes. :?

[click to continue…]

Click here to see full-size image Somewhere along the way the dividing line over gay issues picked up and moved. It’s no longer between red and blue states, or left and right wings, but between nature and nurture. Or, to be more precise, between those who believe what the popular culture feels about homosexuality and those who put their faith in the Bible and Church history.

The above paragraph is not a quote, but rather a correction for Ellen Goodman’s opening salvo in her Sullivanesque screed “A Vatican Retreat on Homosexuality.”

In a brilliant display of cluelessness regarding Christianity (only outdone by Ruth Gledhill), Ms. Goodman attempts through an emotional appeal, to shift the argument away from holy Scripture and established Church polity. Instead, intentional or not, she argues that the Catholic Church is in need of an overhaul by not basing their decisions regarding homosexual seminarians solely on the nature versus nurture argument.

An argument, if followed to its radical extreme would make allowances for advocates of drunkeness, gluttony and sloth. After all, “Americans seem reluctant to condemn people simply for who they are.” So how could we possibly discriminate against whom actively and willingly advocate and/or submit to their genetic and or chemical predispositions to alcoholism, obesity and or laziness?

In a further attempt to shift the terms of the debate to the temporal Goodman throws down the scapegoat card ignoring the impact of a thirty year practice of U.S. Catholic seminaries admitting actively gay Jesuits – without at least mentioning the alarming parallel of sexual abuse cases along that same timeframe – and at least without identifying some other reason or cause for the abuse problem.

All this energy and hyperbole when in fact all that really recently happened was the Vatican extended its prohibition on sexually active priests and seminarians to include homosexuals.

All this beefing along the lines of “what about my needs” when Christian leadership is defined by the compassionate yet convicted, suffering, sacrificial servant – in spite of whatever sin nature afflicts us most; genetic or otherwise.

“… for if someone does not know how to manage his own household, how will he care for God’s church?” – 1 Timothy 3:4-5

update: If you’re interested in what other Christian bloggers have to say about all this, I’ve compiled a short compendium entitled “Sex in the Seminary.”

womenI want to write an exposé article about these whiny women firefighters (reg. req. – use BugMeNot to bypass) suing Fairfax County because of sexual harassment and discrimination. But I need your help.

Before I start ranting and finger-pointing, I want to have the facts straight. I need to know one thing: Are the physical requirements for becoming a firefighter in Fairfax County identical for men and women? I e-mailed the training division and general information address with the same question. The department is probably overloaded with media inquiries right now.

If the answer is “No,” these gals have no basis on which to cry about “discrimination.” If the answer is, “No,” they were hired under “affirmative action.” Despite what the Supreme Court says, sex-based preferences are unconstitutional.

And if the women had second-class living quarters, I don’t think suing the county is necessary. They should get the union to demand better quarters. But suing the county because they have no heat? It’s a smokescreen. And pregnant firefighters who demand “flexible” hours want special, not equal, treatment.

And about the “harassment,” I’ll tell you what’s going on. Here is my biased, female opinion based on a couple of decades of deliberate interaction with members of the masculine sex, deep insight into human nature, and a cursory knowledge of biology: It’s harassment only if he’s ugly. :?

(“Or poor!” – Commenter)

Related posts:

[click to continue…]

Related Posts with Thumbnails